What Is a 305 Status Code?

The 305 Use Proxy status code was defined in an earlier version of the HTTP/1.1 specification as a redirection response that instructed the client (such as a browser or API consumer) to access the requested resource via a specified proxy server.

In simpler terms, when a server responded with a 305 status, it was telling the client:
“You can’t get this resource directly — you need to route your request through this particular proxy to reach it.”
The proxy’s address was included in the Location header of the HTTP response, and the client was expected to resubmit its request using that proxy.

Official Definition

According to RFC7231 Section 6.4.5 (and earlier RFC 2616), the formal meaning was:

The requested resource must be accessed through the proxy given by the server in the Location header.
The recipient (the client) must not automatically redirect the request to that proxy for any subsequent requests — it applied only to the current request.

This made the 305 unique among the 3xx redirection codes because it dealt specifically with proxy configuration rather than simply pointing to another direct resource or endpoint.

Historical Context

The 305 status code was introduced as part of HTTP’s effort to standardize how clients should interact with proxy servers under certain conditions.
However, it came with important limitations:
- It was never widely adopted.
- Few clients or browsers implemented it.
- It posed security risks (which I will cover in depth in the next section).
Because of these issues, the 305 status code has since been deprecated and is no longer considered part of best practices or modern HTTP implementations.

Related Resources

What is a 101 Status Code?
What is a 102 Status Code?
What is a 200 Status Code?
What is a 201 Status Code?
What is a 202 Status Code?
What is a 208 Status Code?
See All Status Code

SEO Services

Other Services

Insights

Blogs

Key Features

Category: 3xx Redirection.
Action Triggered: Instructs the client to use a proxy for the resource.
Header Involved: Relies on the Location header to tell the client where the proxy is.
Scope: Applies only to the current request — does not set persistent proxy behavior.

Example (Hypothetical)

A server might respond like this:

HTTP/1.1 305 Use Proxy  
Location: http://proxy.example.com:8080

The client, upon receiving this, was expected to:

Route the original request through the provided proxy.
Retrieve the resource by asking the proxy, not the origin server directly.

Modern Relevance

Today, the 305 status code exists mostly as a historical footnote.

It’s included in older documentation but is no longer implemented in major browsers or applications.
Most developers will never encounter it in active use unless working on legacy systems or reading old specifications.

Why Was the 305 Status Code Deprecated?

The 305 Use Proxy status code was officially deprecated because it introduced significant security concerns that outweighed any potential benefit. Although it was initially added to help servers instruct clients to access resources through a specified proxy, the risks quickly became clear as browsers and client applications started evaluating its real-world use.

Let’s break down why the 305 was retired from the HTTP standard.

1. In-Band Proxy Configuration Is Dangerous

The key problem with the 305 status code was that it attempted to manage proxy behavior within the HTTP protocol itself — specifically, inside the response headers.
This meant:

A server could instruct a client to forward its request through any proxy it named.
The client, by design, was expected to obey that instruction.

This opened the door to several attack vectors:

Man-in-the-middle attacks: A malicious server could redirect clients through a proxy it controlled, allowing it to intercept, modify, or log sensitive data.
Hijacking of secure sessions: If clients blindly redirected even sensitive HTTPS requests through a proxy, the attacker could break the security guarantees of the original connection.
Bypassing local network policies: Clients might be forced to use proxies they were never intended to connect through, potentially leaking internal or private network traffic.

2. Browser Vendors Stopped Supporting It

Due to these security risks, major web browsers quickly recognized that the 305 mechanism was too dangerous to implement safely.

Firefox explicitly ignores 305 responses.
Internet Explorer (now legacy) and other major browsers similarly refuse to act on them.
Modern HTTP client libraries (used in programming languages and frameworks) typically do not process 305 responses either.

Without browser or client support, the 305 became a theoretical feature that had no reliable, real-world implementation.

3. Official Deprecation in HTTP Standards

Recognizing the widespread lack of adoption and the inherent security issues, the HTTP Working Group deprecated the 305 status code in later specifications.
Specifically:

RFC 2616 originally defined the 305.
RFC 7231 (the updated HTTP/1.1 standard) formally marked it as deprecated, warning against its use.

Today, developers are strongly advised not to use or rely on 305 — it’s essentially a “dead” code.

The 305 Use Proxy status code was deprecated because:

It allowed potentially malicious servers to dictate proxy usage.
It introduced critical security vulnerabilities.
Browser and client support was effectively abandoned.
HTTP standards bodies formally retired it in updated protocols.

In modern web development, proxy configuration is considered a network-level or system-level concern — not something managed through in-band HTTP headers or responses.

When Was the 305 Status Code Used?

Although the 305 Use Proxy status code is now deprecated and practically unused, it was originally designed to handle very specific network and access scenarios. Understanding when it was meant to be used helps explain why it existed — and why it ultimately failed in real-world deployment.

Let’s break down its intended (but short-lived) use cases.

1. Restricted or Controlled Network Access

The primary idea behind 305 was to allow a server to tell the client:

“You cannot access this resource directly; you must go through this specific proxy.”

This was useful in environments where:

Certain resources were only accessible through controlled gateways.
Organizations wanted to restrict direct access but still allow clients to reach protected resources through approved intermediaries.

Example:
A corporate intranet might expose an external-facing server but require that some internal documents be accessed only through the corporate proxy.

2. Load Management or Caching via Proxy

In theory, a server could use 305 to offload heavy requests or distribute traffic through a proxy.
By directing clients to route large downloads, media streaming, or computationally expensive API calls through a specified proxy, the origin server could:

Reduce its direct bandwidth load.
Allow the proxy to handle caching or distribution.
Balance traffic across multiple access points.

3. Proxy-Specific Resource Delivery

Some systems envisioned using 305 to deliver content that depended on the presence of a proxy.
For example:

Proxy filtering systems.
Proxy-translated resources (like regional content or modified files).
Corporate networks enforcing compliance or auditing through proxy inspection.

In these cases, the server’s response instructed the client: “This resource is only valid or accessible when accessed via this defined proxy path.”

Why It Didn’t Succeed

Despite these intended use cases, the real-world problems were:

Security: A malicious or misconfigured server could redirect sensitive traffic through untrusted proxies.
Compatibility: Browsers and HTTP clients quickly realized the risks and chose not to implement or obey 305 responses.
Better Alternatives: Proxy behavior is better managed outside the HTTP layer — through browser settings, operating system configurations, VPNs, or corporate network policies.

The 305 status code was intended for niche situations where a server needed to enforce access via a specific proxy, whether for access control, load balancing, or specialized content delivery.
However, the combination of security concerns, lack of client adoption, and the rise of better alternatives meant that the 305 was never widely used and ultimately fell into deprecation.

Can You Use the 305 Status Code Today?

The simple answer is: No, you should not and cannot reliably use the 305 Use Proxy status code today in any modern web development, application, or network environment.

Let’s break down why.

1. Official Deprecation in HTTP Standards

The 305 status code was officially deprecated in RFC 7231, the current HTTP/1.1 specification.
This means:

It is no longer considered a valid, recommended, or supported part of the HTTP protocol.
Standards bodies advise against its use due to the risks and lack of support.
New systems, libraries, and tools are designed with the expectation that 305 will never appear in production or operational traffic.

In practice, most HTTP libraries, frameworks, and server implementations either do not generate 305 responses or actively block or ignore them.

2. Lack of Browser and Client Support

Even before the official deprecation, major web browsers and client applications had already dropped or refused to implement support for 305.
Why?

The security implications were too dangerous.
There were no meaningful, widely accepted use cases that justified the risk.
Proxy configurations are better handled at the system, browser, or network level — not through in-band HTTP redirection.

Examples:

Firefox: Explicitly ignores 305 responses.
Internet Explorer: Never implemented 305 support.
Chrome, Safari, Edge: Also avoid processing 305.

This means that even if a server sends a 305, clients will ignore it, making it useless for real-world deployments.

3. Security Risks Outweigh Any Benefit

Using a 305 response effectively allows a server to dictate the network path a client should use, which opens up:

Potential man-in-the-middle attacks.
Traffic interception or logging risks.
Unintended network behavior.

In today’s security-focused landscape, allowing arbitrary proxy redirection via HTTP is seen as fundamentally unsafe.

4. Modern Alternatives Are Stronger

Today’s web applications and networks use:

System-configured proxies (set at the OS or browser level).
CDNs and reverse proxies (managed at the server/network layer, not instructed through HTTP headers).
VPNs and corporate tunnels (for securely routing traffic through controlled gateways).

These solutions offer much stronger, safer, and better-supported ways to control how traffic is routed without relying on insecure in-band instructions.

Summary

You cannot and should not use the 305 Use Proxy status code today because:

It is deprecated in the official HTTP standard.
Browsers and clients ignore it.
It introduces unacceptable security risks.
There are far better and safer modern alternatives.

How Do Other HTTP Redirect Codes Compare to 305?

To fully understand why the 305 Use Proxy status code became obsolete, it helps to compare it side by side with other 3xx HTTP redirect codes that remain in active, secure use today. Each of these status codes has a distinct purpose and behavior, with clear differences from 305.

Let’s break this down carefully.

1. 300 Multiple Choices

Purpose: Offers the client multiple possible resources to choose from (like different formats or languages).
Client Behavior: Selects the most appropriate option, sometimes with user input.
Use Case: Rare today, but theoretically useful for offering variants.

How it differs from 305:
300 doesn’t involve proxy instructions — it’s about letting the client choose between multiple resource options.

2. 301 Moved Permanently

Purpose: Redirects the client permanently to a new URL.
Client Behavior: Updates bookmarks and future requests to the new address.
SEO Impact: Passes link authority; widely used for permanent URL changes.

How it differs from 305:
301 only redirects to a new resource, not through a proxy — and it’s secure, well-supported, and critical for SEO.

3. 302 Found (Temporary Redirect)

Purpose: Temporarily redirects to a different URL.
Client Behavior: Returns to the original URL in future requests.
Use Case: For temporary moves or dynamic routing.

How it differs from 305:
Again, it’s about pointing to another resource, not rerouting through a proxy, and it’s safe and widely supported.

4. 303 See Other

Purpose: Directs the client to retrieve a related resource using a GET request.
Client Behavior: Always switches to GET, even if the original request was POST or PUT.
Use Case: Used after form submissions or action endpoints.

How it differs from 305:
It separates action from result retrieval, without involving proxies or security risks.

5. 304 Not Modified

Purpose: Tells the client its cached version is still valid, no need to re-download.
Client Behavior: Uses its local copy.
Performance Impact: Reduces bandwidth, improves load times.

How it differs from 305:
It’s part of caching and validation, not network routing or proxy control.

6. 307 Temporary Redirect

Purpose: Temporarily redirects while preserving the original HTTP method.
Client Behavior: Resends the request exactly as it was.
Use Case: Safe for POST or PUT without converting to GET.

How it differs from 305:
Like 302, it’s about where to fetch the resource, not how to route the request through network paths.

Why 305 Stands Alone

Unique Purpose: 305 was the only redirect code designed specifically to tell clients to use a proxy.
Security Risk: None of the other redirect codes instruct clients to change their network routing; they only point to different content locations.
Modern Relevance: All active redirect codes are safe, supported, and useful today — 305 is neither safe nor supported.

Table

Code	Meaning	Modern Use?	Proxy Behavior?
300	Multiple Choices	Rare, niche	No
301	Moved Permanently	Common, critical	No
302	Found (Temporary)	Common	No
303	See Other	Common in APIs	No
304	Not Modified	Common in caching	No
305	Use Proxy	Deprecated	Yes (insecure)
307	Temporary Redirect	Common, safe	No

What Should Developers Use Instead of 305?

Because the 305 Use Proxy status code has been deprecated and is no longer supported by modern clients or browsers, developers and system architects need to rely on more secure, reliable, and modern methods for controlling how network traffic is routed through proxies or intermediaries.

Let’s explore what you should use today instead of the outdated 305.

1. Configure Proxies at the System or Network Level

Modern proxy configurations are typically handled:

In browser settings (e.g., Chrome, Firefox, Edge) where users or administrators can define proxy servers manually.
At the operating system level (e.g., Windows, macOS, Linux network settings) where system-wide proxies can be set.
Through corporate network configurations where group policies or domain configurations automatically enforce proxy usage.

This approach:

Keeps proxy decisions outside the untrusted HTTP layer.
Avoids passing sensitive routing instructions through potentially insecure HTTP headers.
Allows administrators full control over when and how proxies are used.

2. Use VPNs or Secure Tunnels

For environments where traffic needs to be routed through a secure path, such as:

Corporate networks accessing internal resources.
Remote teams needing access to internal tools.
Multi-region teams connecting to regional resources.

Instead of using in-band proxy signals, organizations today deploy:

VPNs (Virtual Private Networks).
SSH tunnels or secure forwarding setups.
Zero-trust network access systems.

These systems wrap all traffic securely and are configured outside the HTTP layer, providing stronger security guarantees.

3. Deploy Reverse Proxies or Load Balancers

For developers managing server-side infrastructure:

Reverse proxies (like NGINX, Apache, or HAProxy) can handle routing incoming requests internally.
Load balancers can distribute traffic across multiple backends without the client needing to know or configure anything.

These tools work:

Transparently from the client’s perspective.
Without requiring the client to modify its request or know about backend infrastructure.

4. Leverage CDNs (Content Delivery Networks)

When you want to optimize delivery or route traffic intelligently based on location or network conditions, use a CDN like:

Cloudflare, Akamai, Fastly, or AWS CloudFront.

CDNs handle traffic routing, caching, and edge optimization at the infrastructure level, not by instructing the client through HTTP responses like the deprecated 305.

5. Enforce Access Controls on the Server

Instead of relying on proxy-level enforcement, modern security practices recommend:

Authentication and authorization on the origin server.
IP whitelisting or blacklisting at the firewall or server level.
Network access control lists (ACLs) that define which networks can access sensitive resources.

These controls ensure only authorized clients can access protected resources — without needing to rely on instructing them to use specific proxies.

Instead of using the deprecated and insecure 305 status code, developers today should:

Configure proxies at the system, browser, or network level.
Use VPNs or secure tunnels for sensitive traffic.
Manage routing with reverse proxies, load balancers, or CDNs.
Apply strong server-side access controls to protect sensitive resources.

Modern infrastructure and security best practices have fully replaced the need for anything like 305, making today’s web ecosystem much safer and more resilient.

Why 305 Belongs in the Past

The 305 Use Proxy status code is now a historical artifact — a part of HTTP’s past that reflects how early web protocols experimented with ideas that, over time, proved to be insecure or impractical. While its original purpose seemed useful, modern security and network practices have rendered it obsolete and even risky.

Let’s summarize why 305 no longer belongs in today’s development or networking environment.

1. Designed for Proxy Instructions, But Dangerous

The 305 was introduced to allow servers to tell clients,

“You can only access this resource through the proxy I specify.”

This in-band control over network routing posed serious security risks:

Servers could direct clients to untrusted or malicious proxies.
Sensitive traffic could be intercepted or manipulated.
Clients had no reliable way to verify or control the safety of the proxy instructions.

2. Deprecated by Official Standards

Due to its security flaws and lack of safe, widespread use, the 305 was formally:

Deprecated in RFC 7231 — the modern HTTP/1.1 standard.
Marked as “do not use” for developers and system administrators.

This means that no modern system is expected to generate or obey 305 status codes.

3. Abandoned by Browsers and Clients

Even before the standards bodies deprecated it, major browsers and HTTP clients:

Ignored 305 responses.
Chose not to implement 305 handling due to the risks involved.
Relied instead on user- or system-configured proxy settings, not server-driven instructions.

Without client support, a status code becomes meaningless in practice.

4. Better Modern Alternatives Exist

Today, any problem 305 was meant to solve is better addressed using:

System or browser proxy configurations.
Reverse proxies and load balancers at the server edge.
CDNs for intelligent traffic distribution.
VPNs and secure tunnels for sensitive traffic.
Strong server-side access control mechanisms.

These tools offer more secure, more robust, and better-supported solutions than anything the 305 mechanism could have provided.

Final Takeaway

The 305 status code belongs in the past because:
✅ It’s insecure.
✅ It’s deprecated by standards.
✅ It’s unsupported by clients.
✅ It’s replaced by safer, modern solutions.

For any developer, sysadmin, or network architect, the best practice today is to avoid 305 entirely and lean on modern, battle-tested technologies for proxy management and access control.

Does a 102 Status Code Affect SEO?

On the surface, the 102 Status Code seems harmless—it’s just an interim response. But if it’s not handled properly, it can quietly impact how search engines like Google interact with your site. Let’s break it down.

Search Engines Don’t Expect 1xx Codes

Most crawlers—especially Googlebot—are designed to handle final responses like 200, 301, or 404. They typically ignore 1xx status codes, including 102. That means if your server fails to follow up with a valid final response after sending a 102, it could:

Confuse the crawler
Cause indexing delays
Lead to partial or missed crawls
Undermine your chances to rank on top of Google

That’s why you should never rely on a 102 alone—it must always be followed by a standard final response like 200 OK.

Bot Behavior: Keep It Clean

Search engine bots don’t wait around forever. If your server sends a 102 and then stalls—or responds too slowly—Google might skip that URL or reduce its crawl frequency. Over time, this can affect:

Your crawl budget
Indexing of new content
SEO performance in Dubai’s competitive markets

A properly configured server ensures a seamless flow between informational and final responses—something our SEO consultants in Dubai continuously monitor for our clients.

Best Practices from Our Technical SEO Team

At SEO Firm Dubai, we recommend:

Only using 102 when necessary (e.g., complex APIs, long database queries)
Logging all 102 responses and checking they’re followed by a proper 2xx or 4xx/5xx
Avoiding excessive use of 102 for basic GET requests
Testing your response headers regularly via tools like Chrome DevTools or curl

AI-Powered Technical Audits

Our AI-driven SEO services go beyond keywords—we help you monitor server performance, HTTP response behavior, and search engine compatibility in real time. Whether you’re using Nginx, Apache, or custom middleware, we ensure your stack sends the right signals to search engines.

Need help making your site SEO-friendly at every level?

👉 Book a free audit with Dubai’s most professional SEO company:
🔗 SEO Firm Dubai

FAQ – 102 Status Code Explained

What is a 102 Status Code in HTTP?

A 102 Status Code means the server has received your request and is still processing it, but hasn’t finished. It’s an interim response used to prevent timeouts during long operations like API calls or database queries.

Is 102 Status Code an error?

No, it’s not an error. It’s an informational HTTP status code used to signal that processing is underway. It should always be followed by a final response like 200 OK or 500 Internal Server Error.

Does Googlebot understand 102 responses?

Googlebot and other search engine crawlers generally ignore 1xx status codes. If a 102 response is not followed by a final status, it may impact crawl efficiency or indexing, which is why proper configuration is essential.

When should I use a 102 Processing code?

Use it only when the server expects a long processing time and wants to avoid client or bot timeouts. Common in WebDAV, complex APIs, and real-time platforms. Avoid using it for simple requests.

Can a 102 Status Code affect SEO?

Yes—indirectly. While the code itself isn’t harmful, improper use (like not sending a final response) can cause search engines to miss or delay crawling, affecting your site’s visibility and rankings on Google SERPs.

Don’t Let Your Server Stay Silent

The 102 Status Code is your server’s way of saying “Working on it!”—but like any good communication, it needs follow-through.

If you’re unsure whether your server responses are SEO-friendly or crawlable, our SEO specialists in Dubai are here to help.

Additional resources

Return to Glossary

Return to SEO Firm Dubai