What Is a 300 Status Code?

A 300 status code, formally called 300 Multiple Choices, is an HTTP response indicating that the requested resource has multiple available representations, and the client can choose one. Unlike automatic redirects, the server provides a list of options, and the client decides which to follow. It’s rarely used in modern web development.

At its core, this code tells the client (such as a web browser or application):
“There’s more than one possible response or representation available for the resource you requested — you can pick the one you prefer.”
In contrast to automatic redirects like 301 (Moved Permanently) or 302 (Found), the 300 response does not automatically push the client to a new URL. Instead, it hands back a list of possible choices. The server might provide a preferred option using the Location header, but the final decision is left to the client (if the client understands how to handle it).

Key details from the HTTP specification

For request methods like HEAD, the server only needs to provide headers, not a body.
For methods like GET, the server should include a response body with metadata or a list of the available options so the user or user agent can choose.
There is no mandated format for how this list is presented, but it’s usually in a format the client can parse (like HTML or structured hypertext).

Example scenario:
Imagine a user requests a product catalog file at https://example.com/catalog. The server has three versions:

A PDF version (/catalog.pdf)
An HTML web page version (/catalog.html)
A JSON version for API use (/catalog.json)

Instead of guessing which the client wants, the server returns a 300 Multiple Choices response, listing these three URIs. The client can then pick one (manually or automatically) to follow.

However, modern practice has shifted away from using 300 responses because most browsers do not have built-in behavior to present these choices interactively. Instead, sites usually handle variations through:

Content negotiation (via Accept headers)
Client-side detection and routing
Explicit user-facing choices (like language selectors or format download buttons)

The 300 status code is technically a redirection response, but unlike common 301 or 302 redirects, it’s about providing options, not forcing one path. It requires the client’s participation to complete the request by selecting the best-fit resource.

Related Resources

What is a 101 Status Code?
What is a 102 Status Code?
What is a 200 Status Code?
What is a 201 Status Code?
What is a 202 Status Code?
What is a 208 Status Code?
See All Status Code

SEO Services

Other Services

Insights

Blogs

When Is a 300 Status Code Used?

The 300 Multiple Choices status code is used in situations where a server has multiple valid representations of the same resource, and it cannot or should not automatically decide which one to serve.

Instead of forcing the client onto a default path, the server responds with a list of available options, allowing the client (user agent, browser, or application) to make the final choice.

Typical conditions for using a 300 status code include:

When the same document exists in multiple languages (e.g., English, French, Arabic) and the server expects the client to pick.
When a resource exists in multiple formats or encodings (e.g., video available in MP4, WebM, Ogg).
When there are multiple media types available (e.g., an API offering both JSON and XML versions of a response).

Here’s a real-world example:
Suppose you run a global news website, and the homepage is available in English (/en), Spanish (/es), and Chinese (/zh). Instead of forcing visitors to the English version, the server could respond with a 300 status code and provide all three options, letting the client pick based on the user’s language preferences or browser configuration.

However, in practice, this is rarely implemented. Modern systems often handle this negotiation using:

The Accept-Language header for languages.
The Accept header for content types.
Server-side or JavaScript-driven automatic redirection.

Why?
Because most browsers and clients do not have built-in logic to handle 300 responses interactively. They expect a clear redirect (like a 301 or 302) or rely on negotiation behind the scenes.

When should you consider using a 300 response?

If you’re building an API or system where the client is explicitly designed to process the list of choices.
If you want to follow a strict HTTP specification for offering alternatives, knowing the client can handle it.
In experimental or educational projects demonstrating HTTP negotiation concepts.

In general web development and SEO, however, the 300 status is rarely practical because it can confuse both human users and automated systems (including search engines).

300 Code References

The 300 status code is standardized across HTTP, but in programming, each language or framework provides its own constant or symbol to represent it. This allows developers to write readable, maintainable code without hardcoding raw numbers like 300 directly.

Here’s a breakdown of how the 300 Multiple Choices status is represented across popular languages and frameworks:

Language / Framework	Code Reference
Rails (Ruby)	`:multiple_choices`
Go (Golang)	`http.StatusMultipleChoices`
Symfony (PHP)	`Response::HTTP_MULTIPLE_CHOICES`
Python 2	`httplib.MULTIPLE_CHOICES`
Python 3+	`http.client.MULTIPLE_CHOICES`
Python 3.5+	`http.HTTPStatus.MULTIPLE_CHOICES`

Let’s break it down with practical examples.

Example 1: Python 3+

import http.client

print(http.client.MULTIPLE_CHOICES)  # Output: 300

Example 2: Go

package main

import (
    "net/http"
    "fmt"
)

func handler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    w.WriteHeader(http.StatusMultipleChoices)
    fmt.Fprintln(w, "Multiple choices available.")
}

Example 3: Symfony (PHP)

use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response;

$response = new Response(
    'Multiple choices available.',
    Response::HTTP_MULTIPLE_CHOICES
);
$response->send();

Example 4: Ruby on Rails

class ResourcesController < ApplicationController
  def show
    head :multiple_choices
  end
end

Why are these constants useful?

They improve readability by making code self-explanatory.
They reduce the risk of typos or using the wrong status code.
They align with framework-specific best practices and ensure consistent behavior.

In modern development, even if you rarely use a 300 response, knowing these references ensures you understand how to implement or handle it correctly in any stack.

300 vs. Other Redirect Status Codes

To fully understand where 300 Multiple Choices fits, it’s important to compare it side by side with other common HTTP redirect status codes in the 3xx family.

Here’s a detailed comparison:

Status Code	Name	Auto Redirect?	Permanent?	Purpose
300	Multiple Choices	No	N/A	Indicates multiple options; client is expected to choose.
301	Moved Permanently	Yes	Yes	Resource has been permanently moved to a new URL; search engines pass link equity to new URL.
302	Found	Yes	No	Temporary redirect; the requested resource resides temporarily under a different URI.
303	See Other	Yes	No	Directs client to retrieve the resource via `GET` at another URI, usually after a POST request.
304	Not Modified	No	N/A	Used for caching; tells the client that the cached version is still valid, no need to re-fetch.
305	Use Proxy	No	N/A	Indicates the requested resource must be accessed through the proxy listed in the response.
307	Temporary Redirect	Yes	No	Like 302 but guarantees the method and body are not changed in the redirected request.
308	Permanent Redirect	Yes	Yes	Like 301 but guarantees the method and body are not changed in the redirected request.

Key takeaways:

300 is unique because it’s about offering choices rather than specifying a destination.
Unlike 301 or 302, the server doesn’t say “go here”; it says, “here’s a list — you decide.”
Most browsers and user agents handle 301/302 automatically, but they do not usually know what to do with a 300 without manual input or custom logic.
For SEO, 301 and 308 are the go-to codes for permanent moves, while 302 and 307 handle temporary changes. The 300 code has little to no SEO use because search engines typically ignore it.

Example situation comparison:

If you permanently move a blog post to a new URL, use 301.
If you temporarily point users to a promotional page, use 302.
If you want to present multiple language or format options, theoretically, you’d use 300 — but in practice, it’s rare because browsers don’t support it interactively.

Example Code Snippets for 300 Status Code

Let’s explore how you can programmatically send a 300 Multiple Choices response in different programming environments. Even though it’s rarely used in production, knowing how to implement it helps deepen your understanding of HTTP behavior.

Example 1: Node.js (Express)

const express = require('express');
const app = express();

app.get('/resource', (req, res) => {
  res.status(300).set('Content-Type', 'text/html').send(`
    <html>
      <body>
        <h1>Multiple Choices</h1>
        <ul>
          <li><a href="/resource-en">English</a></li>
          <li><a href="/resource-fr">French</a></li>
          <li><a href="/resource-es">Spanish</a></li>
        </ul>
      </body>
    </html>
  `);
});

app.listen(3000, () => console.log('Server running on port 3000'));

What’s happening?

We set the status to 300.
We provide an HTML body listing the available choices.
The client (usually a browser) can follow the links to the appropriate resource.

Example 2: Python (http.server module)

from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer

class MyHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
    def do_GET(self):
        self.send_response(300)
        self.send_header('Content-type', 'text/html')
        self.end_headers()
        self.wfile.write(b"""
            <html><body>
            <h1>Multiple Choices</h1>
            <ul>
                <li><a href="/option1">Option 1</a></li>
                <li><a href="/option2">Option 2</a></li>
            </ul>
            </body></html>
        """)

server = HTTPServer(('localhost', 8080), MyHandler)
print("Server running on port 8080")
server.serve_forever()

Example 3: PHP (native)

<?php
http_response_code(300);
header('Content-Type: text/html');
echo '<html><body><h1>Multiple Choices</h1>
<ul>
    <li><a href="/path1">Path 1</a></li>
    <li><a href="/path2">Path 2</a></li>
</ul></body></html>';
?>

Important Notes:

Simply setting a Location header on a 300 response is optional; the server can include it if there’s a preferred choice, but the point is to let the client decide.
Most browsers do not offer a built-in interface for handling 300 responses, so including a human-readable HTML list is critical if you want the user to make a choice manually.
In APIs, you might use JSON or XML instead of HTML, provided the client is programmed to understand the response.

SEO Implications of 300 Status Codes

When it comes to SEO, 300 Multiple Choices responses are not commonly used or recommended — and here’s why.

First, let’s break it down:

Search engine crawlers (like Googlebot) are designed to follow clear signals. A 301 (Moved Permanently) tells the crawler, “This page has moved here — pass link equity to the new page.”
A 302 (Found) or 307 (Temporary Redirect) says, “This move is temporary — keep ranking the original page.”
A 300, on the other hand, says, “Here are multiple options — pick one,” but crawlers are not designed to handle this kind of reactive negotiation.

In most cases, Google and other search engines simply ignore or skip 300 responses because they don’t want to guess which option to index or rank. This makes 300 effectively invisible in SEO strategies.

Direct SEO Implications of 300 Status Codes:

No guaranteed link equity transfer like a 301.
No clear ranking signal — search engines avoid ambiguity.
Increased bounce risk: if users land on a page where they’re forced to choose manually (especially if the client doesn’t handle 300 automatically), they may leave, raising bounce rates.
Missed opportunity: without automatic or well-structured alternatives, crawlers may fail to index valuable versions of your content.

Best SEO Practices (instead of using 300):

Use 301 redirects for permanent moves.
Use hreflang attributes to handle multiple language versions.
Use canonical tags to indicate the preferred version among multiple similar pages.
Use content negotiation headers (Accept-Language, Accept-Encoding) behind the scenes, without exposing a 300 response to the client.

Example:
Let’s say you have English and Spanish versions of your page. Rather than sending a 300, you should:
✅ Use hreflang tags to signal to Google which page is for which audience.
✅ Automatically redirect based on the Accept-Language header (if appropriate).
✅ Keep a clear canonical version to avoid duplicate content confusion.

In short, 300 status codes are not part of modern SEO playbooks. If you’re focused on rankings, traffic, and crawlability, you should stick to redirect and metadata strategies that search engines actively support and understand.

Best Practices and Warnings for Using 300 Status Codes

Even though 300 Multiple Choices is part of the official HTTP standard, it’s rarely used in real-world web development — and for good reason. Here’s a deeper look at why, plus the best practices if you ever decide to implement it.

Why is 300 rarely used today?

Modern browsers don’t handle 300 interactively.
Most browsers do not show the user a choice when they encounter a 300 response. Instead, they simply stop or follow a preferred option if the server includes a Location header — which defeats the purpose of offering multiple choices.
Most clients expect automatic redirects.
Whether it’s human users or bots (like Googlebot), most clients are designed to handle clear, automatic redirection (301, 302, 307, 308). They aren’t built to parse a list of alternatives and make decisions.
SEO and crawlers ignore 300.
Search engines don’t know how to process a list of multiple choices. They want a single, authoritative destination for a given URL. Using 300 creates ambiguity and risks making your content invisible to search engines.

When is it acceptable to use 300?

APIs or custom clients.
If you control both the server and the client (such as in an internal API), and the client is designed to handle multiple choices, a 300 response can be appropriate.
Experimental or educational setups.
You might use 300 in testing environments or when demonstrating how HTTP status codes work.

Best practices if you use a 300 response:
✅ Always include a human-readable body (like HTML) so the user can see the choices manually.
✅ Provide a Location header if you want to suggest a preferred choice (though this may cause some clients to auto-redirect, skipping the list).
✅ Use clear, well-structured links in the response body to help both human users and automated tools.
✅ Be cautious of caching: 300 responses are cacheable by default unless controlled otherwise.

What should you use instead (in practice)?

301 or 308 for permanent redirects.
302 or 307 for temporary redirects.
Content negotiation behind the scenes (using request headers like Accept-Language or Accept) instead of surfacing multiple choices via 300.
Canonical URLs and hreflang tags to handle multilingual or multi-format content without confusing crawlers.

In summary, while the 300 status code offers a neat theoretical tool, it’s generally avoided in modern web development due to poor support, unclear SEO impact, and lack of client-side handling. You’re almost always better off using established redirect strategies or content negotiation mechanisms.

FAQ

When is a 300 status code used?
A 300 status code is used when a server offers multiple versions of the same resource, such as different languages or file formats, and allows the client to select the preferred one. This status does not redirect automatically; the client must handle the choice.

Is a 300 status code good for SEO?
No, a 300 status code is not recommended for SEO. Search engines like Google prefer clear redirects (such as 301 or 302) and typically ignore 300 responses because they create ambiguity about which resource to index.

Additional resources

Return to Glossary

Return to SEO Firm Dubai

What Is a 300 Status Code?

Key details from the HTTP specification

When Is a 300 Status Code Used?

300 Code References

300 vs. Other Redirect Status Codes

Example Code Snippets for 300 Status Code

SEO Implications of 300 Status Codes

Best Practices and Warnings for Using 300 Status Codes

FAQ

Additional resources

LOCATIONS

SERVICES

INDUSTRIES

QUICK LINKS